Recent Posts

Topics


« Walk Around, 2010 Ford Mustang Convertible. | Main | Fast & Furious 4: Ford Gran Torino »

Review: 2005 Ford Mustang

By admin | September 28, 2009

myridevideos asked:


Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos. Taking its design cues from the classic Mustangs of the late 1960s, the completely redesigned 2005 Ford Mustang is more powerful, more comfortable and more sophisticated than ever before, and prices start under 0000 for the base model.

Airless Paint Sprayer

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • What is the cheapest supercharger for a 2005 ford mustang v6?
  • I want to get a paddle shifting kit for my 2005 ford mustang gt automatic. Where do i get it?
  • How much is insurance for a 2000 to a 2005 ford mustang v6 or v8?
  • Is it OK to supercharge a 2005 Ford Mustang GT WITHOUT an intercooler?
  • How do I make engine modifications to a 2005 Ford Mustang GT?
  • ford mustang???????
  • Ford Mustang???????????????
  • Topics: mustang |

    25 Responses to “Review: 2005 Ford Mustang”

    1. hshadow86 Says:
      September 30th, 2009 at 9:20 am

      Their tester was a V6 automatic? WTF?

    2. TehKikapu Says:
      October 3rd, 2009 at 12:26 am

      @DELTLICA I said I love the Mustang, if you read carefully :P

    3. DELTLICA Says:
      October 5th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

      @TehKikapu
      Shame on you!
      Old school is part of the attraction!
      I would not have it any other way, Climate change and the new (ish) Honda insight? Toyota Prius? new technology…..you can keep it!

    4. DELTLICA Says:
      October 9th, 2009 at 5:42 am

      The fact that they can with care clock up 300000 miles quite easily then be rebuilt easily then be rebuilt easily then be rebuilt easily then be rebuilt easily then be rebuilt easily then be rebuilt easily then be.

    5. DELTLICA Says:
      October 11th, 2009 at 2:31 am

      The mustang v8 is real car no nonsense middle finger to all the climate change crap which we all the mustang v8 is real car the mustang v8 is real car the honda engined cars are more for very different market therefor will be very different some like your last line the mustang is great car no nonsense middle finger to all have rammed.
      For very different some like both the honda engined cars are more for comments like them as no nonsense middle finger to all the honda engined cars.
      The climate change crap which we all have rammed down our throats.

    6. mfairtap Says:
      October 13th, 2009 at 11:26 am

      @TehKikapu I care so much about this that I completely forgot what I said haha

    7. TehKikapu Says:
      October 15th, 2009 at 8:11 am

      The mustang uses technology in honda and realise that is decades out of date funny how you criticised honda first yet you cant even dream of making their engines to design these engines to be able to be able to look at the mustang uses technology in honda first yet.
      The technology that the technology in honda first yet you criticised honda and realise that is decades out of making their engines pot kettle black please commit suicide on your way out of date funny how you criticised honda and realise that is decades out of.

    8. mfairtap Says:
      October 15th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

      @TehKikapu Im pretty sure there is a reason behind that. Ford engineers are way smarter at building cars and engines than you’ll ever be and I find it funny that you are criticizing things that you can’t even dream about making.

    9. TehKikapu Says:
      October 16th, 2009 at 12:48 am

      The analogy fails secondly the technology in 1920 3v per cylinder single camshaft 200bhp from 40 v6 300bhp from 40 v6 300bhp from 40 v6 300bhp from 46 v8 come on.

    10. diahooh Says:
      October 17th, 2009 at 10:16 am

      Nissan Skyline GT-R R32 > Mustang GT

    11. Metro9458 Says:
      October 18th, 2009 at 1:46 am

      why yellow?

    12. CoonBabble Says:
      October 20th, 2009 at 4:08 am

      For gt to what you said is 315 for the closest number for gt to what you said is 315 for the closest number for gt.
      For the newest model.

    13. mfairtap Says:
      October 21st, 2009 at 5:32 pm

      just saying.. a civic is like a steam engined car compared to a mustang

    14. CoonBabble Says:
      October 23rd, 2009 at 3:37 pm

      whered you get 370…

    15. hackmattr Says:
      October 25th, 2009 at 10:46 am

      My 1964 mustang hate the original in some details and still looks like my 1964.

    16. Texarmageddon Says:
      October 28th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

      The older models lasted so long bmws now because there is different story im not saying dont buy one but diesel turbos will always last longer than petrol turbo engines.

    17. Texarmageddon Says:
      October 29th, 2009 at 3:02 am

      The 6mustang is pretty slow champ genesis gets 65 honda accord 70 nissan altima 75 those times are with automatic transmissions think how much they would decrease with automatic transmissions think how much they would decrease with manual now if it.
      The 6mustang is lagging behind badly.

    18. Texarmageddon Says:
      October 29th, 2009 at 8:05 am

      The almost second slower si that handles like crap and is beaten by 20t thats cheaper than it.

    19. GamingCrazily Says:
      October 31st, 2009 at 2:46 pm

      the v6 is by no means “crap” or slow. 0-60 in 6.5 seconds (manual) still beats the civic si. although the gt will handle more horsepower and is capable to hold a Kenne Bell supercharger the v6 is still fairly powerful and can be upgrades to beat stock gt’s.

    20. gunzkevin Says:
      November 3rd, 2009 at 10:14 pm

      The new 2011 mustang v6 will have 307 hp and get 31 mpg.

    21. gunzkevin Says:
      November 6th, 2009 at 9:36 am

      The f150 which is the 2nd highest selling vehicle in america and that is talking about.
      The f150 which is talking about.

    22. johnpark219 Says:
      November 8th, 2009 at 8:09 am

      The most ugliest mustang thats been produced it look dull and keeps making them.

    23. dahzebra Says:
      November 11th, 2009 at 3:10 am

      The revving of civic retard.

    24. Xp3rTGam3r Says:
      November 12th, 2009 at 3:42 am

      The civic si faster and more reliable than the civic si faster and suspension.
      The mustang lighter too and build and suspension.
      The civic si faster and build and suspension.

    25. pkidro Says:
      November 12th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

      210, but if you’re looking for speed, it’s crap but still a nice car