2000 FORD MUSTANG GT SPECIAL Or 2003 HONDA CIVIC 2 DOOR LX?
I found two cars that im interested in. Both are around $10,000
2003 HONDA CIVIC 2 DOOR LX - 85,310 km - $9,999.00 - 1.7L, 4 cyl
2000 FORD MUSTANG GT SPECIAL - 97,345 km -$10,550.00
4.6L, 8 cyl.
Im in limbo about these two cars. The Mustang says “BALLS”, while The Civic says “i’ll probably last longer”.
3 times a week, i’ll probably be traveling 20 miles to work in the morning and back again. So about 40 miles a day.
I love cars that just say “Balls”, and Civics say “Their Trying To Drop”. I love the mustang for its power and its sexy look. I like the Civic because it will probably be cheaper on gas, doesnt look so bad.I can’t say any more, One of these cars will have to last me about 1 1/2-2 years… forgot to mention i will probably drive the shit out of both of these cars.
I Need more reasons and opinions about these Cars. If you had to choose between these two which ones would you go for?
Both are under Warranty.
Darren
You Ask, We Answer
March 24th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
As you have posed the question, there is no way to make a rational choice between these two cars. You’re asking: should I look sexy and tough or should I be financially prudent? The answer is: only you can choose what you want to be. The opinions of the rest of us will be of no help; we will only tell you what we would choose.
There is no doubt that the GT will cost you much more money over the next few years. But you haven’t raised a pure money question.
Again, just look at the question, “should I look sexy and tough or should I be financially prudent?” and make a call. That’s the nice thing about life - - we get to make our own calls.
Go for it.